Red has them because the car is pretty modified but I'm trying to keep Shag somewhat traditional and semi stock looking. Opinion please (except for kbmwrs for I already know his thumbs down vote).
-
Hello there guest and Welcome to The #1 Classic Mustang forum!
To gain full access you must Register. Registration is free and it takes only a few moments to complete.
Already a member? Login here then!
sequential tail lights for Shag or not?
- Thread starter cmayna
- Start date
I'd go for it. They are a subtle mod.
Besides, who signals a turn in Kalifornia? No one!
Besides, who signals a turn in Kalifornia? No one!
AzPete
Well-Known Member
I see no question if you are trying to stay traditional and stock looking. No... If you need to buy some to feel better, I will let you buy me a set for the '66.
monkeystash
Active Member
"cmayna" said:
I vote no for sequentials.......but yes to LEDS for visibility and safety (even though you didn't ask.)
With good wiring and good chromed housings, you shouldn't need LED's.
Fast68back
Guest
I have mustang projects taillights but they are non-sesquential. I kinda wish I had gone the other route, they are kinda cool.
Meyer65
Member
I'm not a huge fan... and especially since your going for the stock look I vote no.
Fast68back
Guest
The only difference is the flasher, order sequential and I'll trade ya if you dont like them........
A
Anonymous
Guest
I think you should add them if you're going for the flaming gay, look at me.....look :gobp If not, I would vote NO.
Well I guess that answers that. Gay, Gay, all the way !!!!. :hug2 :3sum
Yes Rick is right (huh?). Per Mustang Project, the only difference is the flasher. So I'll probably start out sequential for I kinda agree with Midlife (another huh?) that it is a very subtle mod and if I don't like it, I'll trade with Rick or buy a non sequential flasher for a whopping $24. but the bright LED's spell S-A-F-E-T-Y.
BTW, I just realized that forgot to mention that I already have the sequential system but now that I'm installing the taillights, I needed to make the decision on staying with them or return them for non-seq's. Knowing that I can go back and forth between seq and non-seq without tearing out the tail lights is nice.
Yes Rick is right (huh?). Per Mustang Project, the only difference is the flasher. So I'll probably start out sequential for I kinda agree with Midlife (another huh?) that it is a very subtle mod and if I don't like it, I'll trade with Rick or buy a non sequential flasher for a whopping $24. but the bright LED's spell S-A-F-E-T-Y.
BTW, I just realized that forgot to mention that I already have the sequential system but now that I'm installing the taillights, I needed to make the decision on staying with them or return them for non-seq's. Knowing that I can go back and forth between seq and non-seq without tearing out the tail lights is nice.
Fast68back
Guest
Well, I dont think we can trade now that I know they will make me :gobp
"Fast68back" said:
If that's all it takes I'd say you are far too close to being there already. :dumas
Don't worry Rick, I refuse to paint Shag GO.
A
Anonymous
Guest
"cmayna" said:
Be careful Craig, it just might happen without you realizing it!
It's a subtle mod, YOU never see it (to hell with the people behind you) and I bet many non-Mustang people would think it's original anyway, I say go for it.
Don't do it. If you want a mod, do like Ryan suggested with the LED's.
DEL65
Of The Morons
I vote for non-seq. Good idea for installing LED's. That was one of the first mods I did, because, even when fully restored, the stock lights are way too dim.
A
Anonymous
Guest
Here's a view that people rarely see (since their in front) of how bright the tail lights are in full sun.......maybe I should go with LED's for when they lap me!
Last edited by a moderator: