Links

StangFix Shopping

+- Random Image from the Gallery

+- Latest Victims

Ausfox
0ur12
kvinkler
joorloop

Author Topic: Intake manifold confusion  (Read 374 times)

Offline sparky

  • Found it!
  • Posts: 14
Intake manifold confusion
« on: August, 29, 2010, 03:20:26 PM »

Just got a Weiand 8020 Stealth intake. Opened box at
speed shop to inspect & it looked good. Paid for it & got
it home ready to install & what do I see, no rear water
ports. Isn't it supposed to have these ports. I looked on
Summit Racing & it shows them. I also looked at the new
8024 & it didn't have these ports. Is this something new
or is this a screwed up manifold?

Offline AzPete

  • Classic...less
  • Global Moderator
  • Shutup Already
  • ******
  • Posts: 9288
Re: Intake manifold confusion
« Reply #1 on: August, 29, 2010, 03:24:04 PM »
I have had two stealths and both had the rear water cross over. I would contact the company.
USAF/Ret.
StangFix....even if it ain't broke, we will tell ya how to fix it.

'11 GT/CS man. #1325 of 2509 Coupes
7 Previously owned..66-07

Offline blue65coupe

  • Banned
  • Donator
  • Shutup Already
  • ******
  • Posts: 7043
  • where's my short bus
Re: Intake manifold confusion
« Reply #2 on: August, 30, 2010, 04:47:40 AM »
+1 on what Pete said. 
Duane
'65 coupe, 289 +0.040, performer pkg, c4 w/kit, 3.55 tl rear, hedmans w/cutouts, blah, blah, blah
'90 GT, 15,xxx miles, bone stock,

Offline 70_Fastback

  • What to build next...?
  • Super Moderator
  • Shutup Already
  • *******
  • Posts: 18209
  • Hell Bent for Speed
Re: Intake manifold confusion
« Reply #3 on: August, 30, 2010, 07:34:50 AM »
Are you talking about a cross over port between the water ports on the rear of the intake? Why do you need these? The water gets pumped into the block via the water pump. Travels to the back of the block then into the heads. It is then pumped to the front of the head and back into radiator. Ports are not needed in the rear of the intake.

+1.

My intakes have no water ports on the rear.
   

Offline AzPete

  • Classic...less
  • Global Moderator
  • Shutup Already
  • ******
  • Posts: 9288
Re: Intake manifold confusion
« Reply #4 on: August, 30, 2010, 07:45:50 AM »
That crossover is not needed. I think stealth is the only one with it. It does provide a rear hot water port for sending units and heater hoses to clean things up a bit. My thing is if it should have it, maybe he got the wrong item.

Offline Jonk67

  • Yak, Yak, Yak
  • ****
  • Posts: 1035
  • Smyrna, TN
Re: Intake manifold confusion
« Reply #5 on: August, 30, 2010, 05:39:43 PM »
Sounds like you may have the Action Plus 8024, my Stealth has 'Stealth' and '8020' embossed at the front of the intake very clearly. Can you post any pics of the top of your intake? Mine has the rear crossover and I will be using it. I can post a pic of mine if you need.
Jon
"If it ain't broke, I haven't fixed it yet" - Jon

1967 Coupe Candyapple red/red int., dlx int., ext. TS hood, ribbed tail panel. 289>333, AOD, 9" 3.50:1, F

Offline Starfury

  • My car HATES me
  • Talks Too Much
  • *****
  • Posts: 1248
Re: Intake manifold confusion
« Reply #6 on: September, 01, 2010, 04:57:47 PM »
I don't believe my Stealth has a rear water crossover.  In any case, you don't need it, as previously stated.
Tad H.
'67 fastback
331 stroker
3sp m/t

 


StangFix Approved Vendors

Sam Auxier Jr. Drag Racing

Classic Recreations

Mustang Magazine

Modern Driveline

Opentracker Racing Products

Street or Track Performance Products

Muscle Car Research LLC

Midlife Harness Resotations

Cars by Chris

Powered by EzPortal