September, 05, 2010, 12:29:53 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Or
News
:
New Look...Same great taste!
Home
Forum
Chat(
)
Help
Shop
SMFbuy
Login
Register
0
Random Image from the Gallery.
65q
Views: 7
By:
monkeystash
Latest Victims
bluegrassg8r
- 05 Sep
MustangMedic
- 03 Sep
Rudolph Schenker
- 01 Sep
CrackrStang71
- 01 Sep
exp428
- 01 Sep
Calendar Events
Today's Events
GREASERAMA! All ratrod show
Top Posters
silverblueBP
6259 Posts
Fast68back
5855 Posts
70_Fastback
5588 Posts
lethal289
5385 Posts
AzPete
5372 Posts
Top Boards
Gum Flapper's Lounge
Topics: 2430 | Posts: 30981
General Mustang Discussion
Topics: 1795 | Posts: 27074
Engine and Drivetrain Board
Topics: 483 | Posts: 6380
Paint & Body
Topics: 227 | Posts: 2779
Who's Online
Guests: 17
Hidden: 0
Users: 11
Users Online:
Spectre
kyle67
Dne'
Kats66Pny
GTA6T7
lethal289
ZFORCE
ko67
B67FSTB
KBMWRS
silverblueBP
StangFix.com Forums
>
1964 1/2 through 1973 Mustang Boards
>
Engine and Drivetrain Board
> Topic:
302 auto vs standard
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Topic: 302 auto vs standard (Read 168 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Rob Z
NewB
Offline
Abducted:February, 16, 2010, 08:39:48 AM
Location: Carlsbad, NM
Posts: 107
1275.50 credits
View Inventory
Send Money to Rob Z
302 auto vs standard
«
on:
March, 02, 2010, 06:32:02 PM »
Reply
I have two Mustangs. Both with 302s. The '69 has a C4 and the 70 has a 3speed.
The 69 engine is near a rebuild. Just getting a tad smokey. The engine is already out of the 70 and rebuilt. My thought is to pull the 69 engine and install the 70 rebuilt engine in the 69. Then I can take my time rebuilding the 69 to put in the 70. Confused yet
These are daily divers. Nothing special and will not end in a show or ever be worth a lot of $$.
Question - Is there a difference between the cranks which would hinder this swap? Or anything else I'll have an issue with??
Thanks
Logged
johnpro
Legendary StangFixer
Offline
Abducted:June, 19, 2009, 12:51:46 PM
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 1287
14027.00 credits
View Inventory
Send Money to johnpro
Re: 302 auto vs standard
«
Reply #1 on:
March, 02, 2010, 07:37:40 PM »
Reply
The difference will all be bolt-on options, with a very possible exception of the heads. The '70's most likely have positive stop rockers, and the '69 likely will be fully adjustable.
Logged
gwstang
Quiet Type
Offline
Abducted:November, 23, 2009, 04:01:17 PM
Posts: 270
3151.75 credits
View Inventory
Send Money to gwstang
Re: 302 auto vs standard
«
Reply #2 on:
March, 03, 2010, 07:32:20 AM »
Reply
Find a 5.0 roller block, much nicer in the long run. Most only need a good honing and re-ring with cam bearings and freeze plugs to be ready to go.
Logged
Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty (Thomas Jefferson)
Rob Z
NewB
Offline
Abducted:February, 16, 2010, 08:39:48 AM
Location: Carlsbad, NM
Posts: 107
1275.50 credits
View Inventory
Send Money to Rob Z
Re: 302 auto vs standard
«
Reply #3 on:
March, 03, 2010, 11:07:56 AM »
Reply
Quote from: gwstang on March, 03, 2010, 07:32:20 AM
Find a 5.0 roller block, much nicer in the long run.
OK, I've seen this reference but lost in actual info. Please define a 5.0 roller block????
Did it have a roller cam, rockers etc?? What years and or cast numbers.
Thanks
Logged
66gt350
Ah like me sum gunz...
Valued Member
Offline
Abducted:October, 20, 2009, 04:56:58 PM
Location: Redding, ca
Posts: 1406
15140.75 credits
View Inventory
Send Money to 66gt350
Re: 302 auto vs standard
«
Reply #4 on:
March, 03, 2010, 01:03:28 PM »
Reply
A roller block is referring to a roller cam. IIRC, it was the mid 80's that ford swapped over to it. The only issue you would have is putting it in a vehicle with a manual tranny. They don't have the threaded hole on the side for the Z-bar. The fox body mustangs use a cable for the clutch.
Logged
-rob
I'm an experienced street racer, who also happens to dabble in flatulence.
No one is listening to you until you fart.
Rob Z
NewB
Offline
Abducted:February, 16, 2010, 08:39:48 AM
Location: Carlsbad, NM
Posts: 107
1275.50 credits
View Inventory
Send Money to Rob Z
Re: 302 auto vs standard
«
Reply #5 on:
March, 04, 2010, 06:40:12 PM »
Reply
Quote from: 66gt350 on March, 03, 2010, 01:03:28 PM
They don't have the threaded hole on the side for the Z-bar. The fox body mustangs use a cable for the clutch.
So what would be involved in changing to a cable? Is it simply going to a cable or a bunch of fab work? This is my first standard car so that part I'm learning as I go.
Logged
66gt350
Ah like me sum gunz...
Valued Member
Offline
Abducted:October, 20, 2009, 04:56:58 PM
Location: Redding, ca
Posts: 1406
15140.75 credits
View Inventory
Send Money to 66gt350
Re: 302 auto vs standard
«
Reply #6 on:
March, 04, 2010, 10:24:22 PM »
Reply
I can't help you out with the cable conversion. I'm running a McLeod hydraulic throwout bearing. But there's gotta be several people here who are running a cable.
Logged
daveSanborn
not Cha Cha Muldowney
Founding Father
Yak, Yak, Yak
Not your average computer genius!
Offline
Abducted:August, 04, 2008, 06:43:29 AM
Location: New Bern NC
Awards:
Posts: 4437
35869.00 credits
View Inventory
Send Money to daveSanborn
Re: 302 auto vs standard
«
Reply #7 on:
March, 06, 2010, 05:15:47 PM »
Reply
One modification normally leads to another and this is a prime example.
Without the Z-bar mounting location on a roller block, yes, swapping to either a cable or hydraulic clutch mechanism is an option.
Using a cable operated clutch has more drawbacks. You'll likely have interference issues with the cable running too close to your exhaust manifolds/headers. Your pedal assembly will need to be modified to mount the cable.
The hydraulic mechanism has no issues other than cost.
If it were me.... I'd focus on just swapping the two engines that you already have. As previously stated, the largest issue you're likely to encounter would be the hassle of swapping all of the front of engine bracketry, but this is usually just a matter of getting all of the brackets lined up the way they need to be.
Logged
Rob Z
NewB
Offline
Abducted:February, 16, 2010, 08:39:48 AM
Location: Carlsbad, NM
Posts: 107
1275.50 credits
View Inventory
Send Money to Rob Z
Re: 302 auto vs standard
«
Reply #8 on:
March, 06, 2010, 11:31:09 PM »
Reply
I think Dave is reading my mind. Althought the roller sounds good I think just the engine swap is my best course. As I plan on taking everything off the 69 engine and placing it on the 70 engine all should ne good.
Thanks to everyone for their thoughts and help.
Planning the wap for 3 weekends from now... I think
Logged
whisperer
NewB
The T-Lock Guy
Offline
Abducted:January, 12, 2010, 11:06:29 PM
Posts: 25
356.75 credits
View Inventory
Send Money to whisperer
Re: 302 auto vs standard
«
Reply #9 on:
March, 07, 2010, 07:33:07 AM »
Reply
Be aware that the motor from the automatic car will need to have a pilot shaft bushing installed in the rear of the crank, and the manual motor will need to have the same removed to fit the torque converter to it. Both the 69 and 70 cranks will be drilled for this from the factory. Other then that it is a bolt-in as long as you are using all the outboard parts from the correct car.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Print
StangFix.com Forums
>
1964 1/2 through 1973 Mustang Boards
>
Engine and Drivetrain Board
> Topic:
302 auto vs standard
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Events
-----------------------------
=> Events
-----------------------------
NewB Introductions and tutorials
-----------------------------
=> NewB Introductions
-----------------------------
Monthly News/Contests
-----------------------------
=> Tutorials
=> Contests
=> Car of the Month
-----------------------------
1964 1/2 through 1973 Mustang Boards
-----------------------------
=> General Mustang Discussion
=> Vendor Evaluation Board
=> Engine and Drivetrain Board
=> Exhaust
=> Heating / Cooling
=> Suspension/Brakes
=> Electrical Board
=> Wheel and Tire Board
=> Paint & Body
=> Interior Board
=> The Track......
=> Member's Build Threads
===> Your Mustang Story
-----------------------------
Eleanor boards
-----------------------------
=> All about the E cars
-----------------------------
1974 and up Mustangs
-----------------------------
=> General Late-Model Discussion
=> Mustang II
=> 1979-1993
=> 1994-2004
=> 2005-2009
=> 2010 +
-----------------------------
StangFix Approved Vendors
-----------------------------
=> Street or Track LLC
=> John's Place (ORP)
=> Midlife's Harness Heaven
=> Classic Recreations
=> Muscle Car Research LLC
=> Modern Driveline
-----------------------------
Tools, Tip, and Classifieds
-----------------------------
=> Classifieds (Mustang)
===> Wanted (Mustang related)
=> Classifieds (General)
===> Wanted
=> Services (All)
===> Wanted
=> Tools
=> Tech Articles
-----------------------------
NON MUSTANG FORUMS....
-----------------------------
=> StangFix Kitchen
=> Gum Flapper's Lounge
StangFix Member Approved Vendors
Loading...