Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Windoze 7 may not like the post box...............
Home
Help
Login
Register
StangFix.com Forums
»
Forum
»
1964 1/2 through 1973 Mustang Boards
»
Exhaust
»
2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
Random Image from the Gallery
Latest Victims
rayms69
automaki
petes68pony
machlarson
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system (Read 673 times)
cmayna
DILLIGARA ?
Super Moderator
Shutup Already
Posts: 5468
2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
on:
February, 13, 2010, 07:45:37 PM »
I am ready to take Shag in for its exhaust system. I had my muffler guy come over to see what I have and he feels comfortable installing a 2.25" system but thinks that 2.50" pipe especially between the Zbar and the steering box is going to be tight. Might have to dimple that area.
So for street application (351c, 4v heads & stock manifolds), can I get by with 2.25" ?
Logged
garner67
Sunroof Option Expert
Donator
Talks Too Much
Posts: 1162
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #1 on:
February, 13, 2010, 10:08:04 PM »
I bet you could "get by" with 2.25", but 2.5" would probably be better.
Then again, what's a few HP... you probably wouldn't even notice the difference in the seat.
Logged
Mike
johnpro
Talks Too Much
Posts: 1287
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #2 on:
February, 13, 2010, 11:11:25 PM »
If I thought you'd ever take it to the track, I'd say find a way to shove the 2.5" in there. Since I don't think you will, it won't matter at all ... go with the 2.25"
Logged
Sluggo
How you like dat Jake?
Administrator
Shutup Already
Posts: 6127
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #3 on:
February, 14, 2010, 05:56:33 AM »
Agreed.
Put some manly tailpipes out back though.
Logged
TwistedBossMach....Coined by Tarafied1
MCA 55330 | 69 Mach1 | 427 Stroker | 29 Model A Murray Town Car | 4 Banger
silverblueBP
Donator
Shutup Already
Posts: 10969
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #4 on:
February, 14, 2010, 08:50:55 AM »
What John said! Not like you'd notice a few less ponies (on the street).
Logged
-Mark-
CarDomain
Exhaust Sound
Fast68back
Administrator
Shutup Already
Posts: 7230
You want fries with that?
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #5 on:
February, 14, 2010, 11:55:28 AM »
"size does matter"...
Logged
Rick
There is a fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"
blue65coupe
Banned
Donator
Shutup Already
Posts: 6609
where's my short bus
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #6 on:
February, 14, 2010, 12:21:49 PM »
You'll be fine with 2.25
Logged
Duane
'65 coupe, 289 +0.040, performer pkg, c4 w/kit, 3.55 tl rear, hedmans w/cutouts, blah, blah, blah
'90 GT, 15,xxx miles, bone stock,
6t9mach1
Quiet Type
Posts: 30
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #7 on:
February, 15, 2010, 06:42:38 AM »
Craig, I dont know much about your motor but it is always best to try to reduce backpressure with your exhaust system when trying to make hp. The 2.5" pipe will have a "deeper" and slightly louder sound. If the car is just going to be a cruiser then a 2.25" system will be okay but it will cost you hp. If making the most hp you can is your goal then a 2.5" system is the smallest I would run. What mufflers are you planning on running? If you're going to run a restrictive muffler that wont flow as much as a 2.5" pipe anyways then the point is mute.
Logged
~Ryan~
69 Mach 1: 4.11 Detroit Locker, 31-spline axles, manual valve body AODE w/ 9.5" Art Carr converter, 500+ hp solid roller 357w build underway!
cmayna
DILLIGARA ?
Super Moderator
Shutup Already
Posts: 5468
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #8 on:
February, 21, 2010, 07:00:13 AM »
I'm planning to run Dynomax's Super Turbo mufflers which do come in both 2.25 and 2.50 systems. I am afraid that if I attempt 2.50, I might need to have the pipe that goes between the steering box and Zbar's lower arm, slightly crimped inward for clearance. If this was needed, would going 2.50 still be worth it?
Logged
garner67
Sunroof Option Expert
Donator
Talks Too Much
Posts: 1162
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #9 on:
February, 21, 2010, 10:27:57 AM »
Keep in mind when the muffler shop bends any size pipe it will be slightly pinched... unless they have a mandrel bender. I looked throughout the SF Bay area, and I couldn't find a shop with a mandrel bender.
So if you start with 2.25" you'll have some pinches in the pipe, especially when the pipe is bent over the axle tubes, which will be smaller than 2.25". I say you might as well start with the larger 2.5" pipe, who cares if there's a minor pinch around the z-bar... you're gonna have some pinches in other places, too.
my 2 cents.
Logged
65coupei6
Quiet Type
Posts: 57
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #10 on:
February, 21, 2010, 01:31:39 PM »
The place I used in Daly City near the cemeteries had a mandrel bender. They gave me a great deal when I told them that, I knew a guy, who knew a guy (if you know what I mean) :ep
Anyways, I would also go with the 2.50 if you can squeeze it in there. Hell, my single exhaust is a 2.25" for my little six.
Logged
...Marco
'65 Mustang Inline 200. Oz 250 Head, Holley 350,
Schneider 260/270 cam, Headers, DSII, MSD 6A, and a whole lotta other stuff!
droptop73
Found it!
Posts: 13
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #11 on:
March, 02, 2010, 03:13:56 PM »
What is the outlet size of the manifold. Going much larger than that will be a waste. Are you planning a merge (X) pipe? It makes a difference in low to mid range power and does not hurt the high end.
Logged
buening
Talks Too Much
Posts: 1186
Re: 2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
«
Reply #12 on:
March, 02, 2010, 06:18:53 PM »
My vote is for the 2.5" exhaust. Those Clevelands have large heads for a reason, they like to breathe! If this were a 289 or 302, I'd be all over the 2.25" for convenience. I think you'll be holding your motor back with 2.25" exhaust. Have you given thought to the Magnaflow Stainless kit? I know it's set up for long tube headers but for the price it really can't be beat. All of my local exhaust shops wanted more for a 2.25" aluminized shop-bent exhaust than the 2.5" stainless mandrell bent kit would have cost me.
Logged
1970 Mach 1 - Grabber Blue 351w/T56
Custom Motor Mounts
T56 Conversion
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
StangFix.com Forums
»
Forum
»
1964 1/2 through 1973 Mustang Boards
»
Exhaust
»
2.25" vs 2.50" exhaust system
StangFix Approved Vendors
Powered by
EzPortal